{
  "$schema": "https://themachinepress.com/schemas/story-v1.schema.json",
  "schema_version": "1.0.0",
  "document_type": "machine_press_story",
  "story": {
    "story_id": "mp-2026-08-10-011",
    "source_story_id": "tmp-story-open-ai-risk-tool-gaps",
    "edition_id": "mp-2026-08-10-morning-0032",
    "edition_url": "https://themachinepress.com/edition/2026-08-10",
    "position": 11,
    "story_type": "dispatch",
    "section": "safety",
    "editorial_classification": "editorial",
    "headline": "AI Risk Tools Covered the Technical Half",
    "slug": "ai-risk-tools-covered-the-technical-half",
    "dek": "A map of 21 open tools found dense coverage of evaluation and guardrails but broad gaps in governance, law and finance.",
    "summary": "A map of 21 open tools found dense coverage of evaluation and guardrails but broad gaps in governance, law and finance.",
    "body_text": "The study maps open-source evaluation and security tools against 32 subcategories in an extended AI-risk taxonomy using an LLM-assisted analysis of code and documentation, followed by three independent reviewers. The reviewers reached moderate agreement, and the final mapping achieved a reported 75.5 percent F1 after majority voting. Coverage clustered around technical and operational controls, leaving legal, governance and market risks sparse. The taxonomy is a planning aid, not a certification of any tool.",
    "why_it_matters": "A map of 21 open tools found dense coverage of evaluation and guardrails but broad gaps in governance, law and finance.",
    "limitations": [
      "The taxonomy is a planning aid, not a certification of any tool."
    ],
    "importance": 7,
    "canonical_url": "https://themachinepress.com/story/mp-2026-08-10-011/ai-risk-tools-covered-the-technical-half",
    "json_url": "https://themachinepress.com/story/mp-2026-08-10-011.json",
    "first_published_at": "2026-08-10T09:00:00.000-04:00",
    "modified_at": "2026-08-10T15:50:00.000-04:00",
    "content_status": "new",
    "is_carryover": false,
    "carryover_reason": null,
    "key_claims": [
      {
        "claim_id": "claim-mp-2026-08-10-011-001",
        "text": "A map of 21 open tools found dense coverage of evaluation and guardrails but broad gaps in governance, law and finance.",
        "source_ids": [
          "source-2026-08-10-011"
        ],
        "qualification": "The taxonomy is a planning aid, not a certification of any tool."
      }
    ],
    "source_ids": [
      "source-2026-08-10-011"
    ],
    "tags": [
      "AI governance",
      "risk tools",
      "open source",
      "guardrails"
    ],
    "image_url": null,
    "corrections": []
  },
  "sources": [
    {
      "source_id": "source-2026-08-10-011",
      "title": "arXiv preprint 2608.07446",
      "publisher": "arXiv",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07446",
      "canonical_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07446",
      "source_type": "primary_research",
      "is_primary_source": true,
      "published_at": "2026-08-07T13:00:00.000-04:00",
      "accessed_at": "2026-08-10T15:30:00.000-04:00",
      "supports_claim_ids": [
        "claim-mp-2026-08-10-011-001"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "corrections": [],
  "publisher": {
    "name": "The Machine Press",
    "url": "https://themachinepress.com",
    "description": "A daily newspaper for the age of artificial intelligence."
  },
  "cite_this_report": {
    "title": "AI Risk Tools Covered the Technical Half",
    "publisher": "The Machine Press",
    "published_at": "2026-08-10T09:00:00.000-04:00",
    "canonical_url": "https://themachinepress.com/story/mp-2026-08-10-011/ai-risk-tools-covered-the-technical-half"
  }
}