safety security
A Language Model Lost Release Authority
An external grammar gate rejected all 21 fabricated ready plans produced on routed, unanswerable commissioning tasks.
Summary
An external grammar gate rejected all 21 fabricated ready plans produced on routed, unanswerable commissioning tasks.
The protocol uses a frozen four-billion-parameter local model only to propose sensor-coordinate and polarity bindings, while a deterministic parser and sealed grammar decide whether a plan can be released. In 144 benchmark tasks, 83 releases had no observed false release and could be reproduced without model calls. The paper also reports a later false release outside that benchmark and 169 incorrect releases across 431 pairings when user answers were wrong. The result demonstrates a narrow separation of proposal and authority, while exposing sensitivity to the gate and input truthfulness.
Why it matters
An external grammar gate rejected all 21 fabricated ready plans produced on routed, unanswerable commissioning tasks.
Limits and context
- The protocol uses a frozen four-billion-parameter local model only to propose sensor-coordinate and polarity bindings, while a deterministic parser and sealed grammar decide whether a plan can be released.
Key claims
An external grammar gate rejected all 21 fabricated ready plans produced on routed, unanswerable commissioning tasks.
Qualification: The protocol uses a frozen four-billion-parameter local model only to propose sensor-coordinate and polarity bindings, while a deterministic parser and sealed grammar decide whether a plan can be released.
Evidence: source-2026-09-26-007
Sources
- arXiv preprint 2609.30219arXiv · primary research
Corrections
No corrections have been recorded for this story.