infrastructure
The Planner Put Stakeholder Rules Into an Ontology
Hard and soft constraints became explainable objects that could be checked, ranked and renegotiated.
Summary
Hard and soft constraints became explainable objects that could be checked, ranked and renegotiated.
The proposed framework encodes multi-stakeholder requirements in an OWL ontology, separating hard limits from preferences before a planner acts. It can identify unsatisfiable combinations, explain which constraints conflict and support structured renegotiation rather than silently relaxing a rule. A FLEXI microgrid case study illustrates the approach; the preprint is an architecture and demonstration, not a broad operational deployment.
Why it matters
Hard and soft constraints became explainable objects that could be checked, ranked and renegotiated.
Limits and context
- A FLEXI microgrid case study illustrates the approach; the preprint is an architecture and demonstration, not a broad operational deployment.
Key claims
Hard and soft constraints became explainable objects that could be checked, ranked and renegotiated.
Qualification: A FLEXI microgrid case study illustrates the approach; the preprint is an architecture and demonstration, not a broad operational deployment.
Evidence: source-2026-09-27-004
Sources
- arXiv preprint 2609.29876arXiv · primary research
Corrections
No corrections have been recorded for this story.