benchmarks evals
Seeing the Scene Was Easier Than Predicting Its Next State
SpaceCast-Bench tests what happens after an intervention, with the strongest evaluated model at 58% versus 87.2% for humans.
Summary
SpaceCast-Bench tests what happens after an intervention, with the strongest evaluated model at 58% versus 87.2% for humans.
SpaceCast-Bench moves beyond reading visible spatial relations to an observe-transform-infer sequence. Its 3,862 questions from 182 real scenes span sixteen task types covering perception, local prediction and global prediction. Among twenty-one tested models, the strongest reached 58%, against 87.2% human performance; specialized spatial models remained near chance. Controlled analyses found bridge views useful for combining observations and explicit 3D evidence more consistently helpful than generated outcome images or video. Fine-tuning Qwen3-VL-4B on programmatically generated data raised its benchmark score from 34% to 65.7%, alongside gains across six outside benchmarks. The results separate naming a present relation from updating a scene that can no longer be directly seen.
Why it matters
SpaceCast-Bench tests what happens after an intervention, with the strongest evaluated model at 58% versus 87.2% for humans.
Limits and context
No additional limitation was separately recorded.
Key claims
SpaceCast-Bench tests what happens after an intervention, with the strongest evaluated model at 58% versus 87.2% for humans.
Evidence: source-2026-10-09-014
Sources
- arXiv preprint 2610.12402, original v1arXiv / submitting research authors · primary research
Corrections
No corrections have been recorded for this story.