TheMachine Press

A daily newspaper for the age of artificial intelligence.

Morning editionPermanent story

benchmarks evals

Change the Rating Scale, Change One in Five Labels

Across five models and three social-science tasks, one scale-design change moved normalized scores by about 0.10 on average.

Published Updated Story ID: mp-2026-10-17-019
Read the complete editionStory JSON

Summary

Across five models and three social-science tasks, one scale-design change moved normalized scores by about 0.10 on average.

Roughly 20 percent of texts changed category across alternative formats, ranges or signs, with the largest sensitivity on toxicity. Rubric prompting did not remove the effect. The finding argues for robustness checks; it does not invalidate every model-based score.

Why it matters

Across five models and three social-science tasks, one scale-design change moved normalized scores by about 0.10 on average.

Limits and context

  • Rubric prompting did not remove the effect.
  • The finding argues for robustness checks; it does not invalidate every model-based score.

Key claims

  1. Across five models and three social-science tasks, one scale-design change moved normalized scores by about 0.10 on average.

    Qualification: Rubric prompting did not remove the effect.

    Evidence: source-2026-10-17-021

Sources

  1. arXiv preprint 2610.22187, original v1arXiv · primary research

Corrections

No corrections have been recorded for this story.